Wednesday, January 20, 2021


Can a man who has committed crimes become POTUS? A man who is in the pocket of a foreign power and a man who has 'won' the office of the most powerful leader of the free world by fraudulent means? Can such a thing be allowed to go ahead when half of America knows this to be the case?

This is not about giving the presidency to Trump as the rightful winner. Trump will leave the Whitehouse, at least temporarily. This about saving the United States constitution.

The military is in control. The Biden 'presidency' is all for show.


Saturday, January 16, 2021

Truth is a pathless land

Unfortunately, the interviewer Robert David Steele's channel was deleted by the YouTube thought police. I'll leave it like this as an example of the diabolical degree of censorship we are experiencing these days.  

Martin Geddes begins with the quote, 'Truth is a pathless land' that he attributes to Jiddu Krishnamurti. Martin is someone I've been following for some years on Twitter and, occasionally, through his blog posts on until they censored him. (He's now been removed from Twitter too.) He began writing articles to explain the Q posts to people and to 'connect the dots' for them. Q posts require a lot of time to research and you also need to know the background so a cursory look will leave most people believing that Q is just a conspiracy theory with no basis in fact.

This interview is really interesting for many reasons and I plan to outline some of them. But firstly, I just want to say that some of the conclusions he has reached, I have been gradually reaching on my own, which we could explain with the idea that Martin and I are in the same collecive consciousness field, that of Q and the Great Awakening, but we also have a similar way of thinking. Robert David Steele, the interviewer, also mentions that Martin has read Jung, and I learned about Jungian philosophy through my study of astrology, so we already speak the same 'language'. I understand the concepts he outlines quickly and easily. 

As Martin says, he was educated at Cambridge so is essentially an academic but he jokes that he has been trying to undo the damage that Cambridge did to him for the last thirty years! (I don't necessarily share this view. Only someone who has had the privilege of an education like Martin's would have the luxury of making such a comparison.) What we are taught in university is one the of topics they touch on, the fact that the history books are basically 'fiction'. I have heard this said many times, and it sounds very likely, since the winners wrote them, but this is evidently a very difficult thing to prove. Where do you find objective truth about the past?

I love the way Martin speaks about systems.

I really recommend reading his book available free at the link below. He summarises everything that's happening so succinctly. Really excellent work.

Thursday, January 7, 2021

Vade retro

 "Yes, indeed. I will not hide that I love that good man very much, that unfortunate father, even more unfortunate than I realized. How it must be for him! We all have our weaknesses. Mine is compassion. There is always a place for sensitivity and Don Benicio is worthy of mine.”

 "But is Don Benicio the person you are interested in at the Neira house?"

 "Well, who else would it be?"

 “Good fellow! Why there are so many young, pretty, attractive girls, each one in her own special way…

 "Vade retro[1]," I replied, smiling to hide my disgust. “Do not fear that I will dispute Don Baltasar’s conquest.”

 Now I do care about what you are concealing from me,” the gossip replied. “Of course, if you cared about one of the Neira girls, you would not care about the peacock Rosa, or the turkey Constanza, or Argos, the pale spotted hen. Of course, if one of them were to bring you misfortune, it would be the same one that would bring it to me if I weren’t insured against it; the nice one, the original one of the house; the only one who doesn't look like her sisters, or any girl from Marineda, or the world!”

"Stop joking with me, Cova," I replied, greatly irritated. You have no reason to suppose that I have lost my senses. Regarding Feíta, you don't have to pester anyone, least of all me. Feíta bites and scratches. If there were only females like her in the world... Fortunately, they are the exception.”

“Don't try to fool me, you sly fox: Feíta is a delightful creature, and you are as amused by her as I am. At first, I couldn’t fathom her, and I even thought she was mad: now I understand her, and I say that she is worth her weight in gold, and that the only ones who disapprove of her and speak ill of her are the fools.”

[1] Latin, literal meaning ‘go back’, used humorously when someone tries to tempt another. From a text in the Benedictine manuscript of 1415, Vade retro Satana (get back Satan), a Medieval Catholic formula for exorcism.